One Mistake That Cost Me Traffic - (and how I fixed it!)
Published: Sat, 04/14/12
Hey, guys, it's Erica Stone. I know, it's been
awhile and, for some of you, this will be the
first email you've seen from me. (I'm obviously
not one of those daily list-senders...)
I've got some information to share with you for more
I've got some information to share with you for more
traffic to your sites and it's all free (and Google safe!).
MY MISTAKE AND HOW I FIXED IT
Of course, I've got to make a little confessionin order to lead into this topic.
See, sometimes I get a little too proud of myselfand I type into Google the biggest keywordsI rank for (even if they're loooong keywords)just to see that I'm still sitting there in thetop spots. (Please tell me I'm not the only one...)
Sure, I have a tool to check rank, MarketSamurai for one (which has now limited freerank checks but is my favorite tool for analyzingcompetition) and the free Firefox Plug-in calledsearch and seeing your site sitting there all happyand ranking well, you know?
Until...you see that it's not ranking quite aswell as it was.
And that was the case. My site had slippedone spot on the first page of Google. A darncompetitor (with a crappy site, of course) hadsnuck on in there and jumped ahead of mewhen I wasn't looking.
But there was one other thing I noticed thatI NEVER would have seen if I'd simply beenusing a rank checker.
My Meta Description was just plain wrong.It was blah, bland, and boring all in one.It dawned on me, if I think it's boring, whatdo searchers think when they see it?
For those of you who don't know, meta descriptionsare the few lines of text that show up underyour search result listing in Google. It's likefree ad space that you can use to attract peopleto your site when they're reviewing their listof search matches in Google.
Was I missing traffic simply because of mypoorly crafted meta descriptions? Could I getmore traffic - even if my rank never improved -just be doing a better job at advertising my own site?
Guess what...it's a YES!
I rewrote four meta descriptions - three for innerpages of my site and one for the home page.I waited a few days for Google to crawl and index thenew descriptions and checked Google Webmaster Tools.By changing the dates on those reports, I cancompare my click through rate in Google whenthe old meta descriptions were showing to theclick through rate for when the new metadescriptions were actively showing.(It's under Your Site On the Web/SearchQueries in Google Webmaster Tools.)
All pages with modified meta descriptions showedan increased click through rate for MULTIPLEkeywords leading to those pages.The home page saw a 38% improvement in theclickthrough rate for JUST my main keyword.There was positive improvement on otherkeywords leading to my home page, too.Same for those 3 inner pages.
All together, those few meta description changesbrought my site traffic back up by an average of 100clicks a day.
Your content might not be ranking as well yetbut that doesn't mean you should ignore this strategy.Prepare NOW for when your pages do rank welland make sure you're crafting strong, uniquemeta descriptions for every page of your site inorder to capture as much free traffic as you can.
This strategy works for Squidoo lenses, too, asmany of you are following the Squidoo Niche Blasterstrategy. That first few lines of text in your introare usually grabbed as the meta description foryour lens. Modify it to work harder for you inGoogle and republish your lens with the new text.
Two great articles that helped me rewritemy meta descriptions:descriptions.
Take a few minutes today and check your meta
BACKLINKING AMIDST THE GOOGLE "SCARE"
That whole meta description stuff is great, but whatdo you do to get pages to rank better in Google these days?
If you're reading any IM forums, you've seen peoplescreaming about nastygrams from Googlein their Wembaster Tools accounts for havingdetected unnatural links. (None of my sites havereceived this message.)
Here's what I know works to improve rankings and traffic on your sites:
My favorite backlink methods are still working. Bookmarking,articledirectories/syndication,web 2.0 (gotta love Squidoo!), and RSS feeds.I still do all the backlinking I've described in Extreme Review and Squidoo Niche Blaster.
Make your sites more than just a collectionof reviews. They should include informationalposts that help boost your overall content.In fact, that's the topic of my next product, dueout in a few days. It will show you how to findthe informational articles you should add to yoursite to build authority, build traffic, and improvethe inner-links to your best review posts.
Build sites other people find worth sharing.The more natural backlinks you can get, the lessyou have to worry about backlinks AT ALL.This requires getting creative, doing some research,figuring out what your competitors aren't doingfor the people in your niche and then doing it.
On one of my sites, I have a very simplecomparison table I built using the WP Table Reloaded plug-in.No graphics added, no colored borders, just a listof facts. That page has been pinned on Pinterestjust over 40 times and not by me or anyone I paid.(I don't even have a Pinterest account.) It's justthat no one else had put that information togetherin that way before.
Update existing content. Find something newand useful to add to reviews you've already written.I'd found that one product on my site was nolonger being sold and had been replaced by anew model.I added just a few lines of text about thatnew model four days ago and now rank#11 for "(new model) review" and #1for the comparison of the two models eventhough I HAVEN'T written a review of that modelyet or added any new post targeting that newmodel. The power of existing content.
Keep your eyes peeled for my next product
and you'll see just how easy it is to find great
content you should add to your Amazon review
sites to make them really stand out and, more
importantly, get more traffic.
Wishing you great success,
Erica Stone
Erica Stone
erica@extremereviewer.com
PS - If you found this helpful, you may be interested
in tips shared in earlier emails: